Skip to main content

Battleground Schools


The first thing that stopped me was the table of conservative and progressive stances on math education. The two stances have pretty much opposing arguments in every area of interest. Reading the table, I realized that I am very used to the conservative way of learning as in high school I was a student who only focused on the facts and algorithms that I was taught and was barely challenged to "present engagement with and development of mathematical modes of thinking that will expand [my] modes of thought and develop flexible problem-solving abilities" (p. 393). However, as a teacher candidate now I see how "progressive" the progressive stances are. Teaching students inquiry will have them focus more on their understanding of math than the abilities to solve problems. Given autonomy, teachers will be able to assess their learners' knowledge and skill levels better.


Another stop was the public criticisms of school mathematics in the late nineteenth century. The "rule of three" that led students to find solutions to proportional equations but failed to provide a "sense of why those particular procedures worked" is a technique that was particularly targeted by progressivists. Teaching students such techniques can sometimes be seen as a nonsense since it is just a technique that helps you find an answer and does not even require thinking or understanding. If students are only taught such techniques they will not ever learn how to explore and process new knowledge. They will just seek answers to problems not knowing or trying to know what those answers might imply or mean.


The third thing that stopped me was the role the media plays in our society. 
The framing the media uses has a great influence on how the public perceives things. It can sometimes deliver a false image of education system and change the point of view the public might have had on it. While playing a significant role in creating images of many things, the media should also reflect public opinion about those things. Holding its own biases and ideologies, the media cannot really reflect pure public opinion.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Skemp: Relational Understanding and Instrumental Understanding

The advantages of instrumental understanding Skemp lists in this article can be viewed as study strategies for students who want to have easier grades and see apparent progress. This type of learning could help students who have had serious problems with mathematics and just need the grades to pass a course. Although my teaching experience is very limited, I have witnessed quite a few students who say they hate mathematics, and some of those students even think that they would not need mathematics in the real world. They might be right in some way, but if they were taught to learn relationally rather than instrumentally, their mathematical approaches towards the world might have been very different. With instrumental mathematics taught, students might think they understand, but they are not able to apply those concepts they learned to different situations. Lack of this skill leads to memory work and eventually boring classes. In boring classes students tend to strive for ...

Unit Plan

EDCP 342A Unit planning Yeni Yoo St. John’s School, Math 8 Ratios, Rates, and Percentages Preplanning questions: (1) Why do we teach this unit to secondary school students? This unit explores the concepts of ratios, rates, and percentages. The unit focuses on some of the most essential mathematical skills that students could apply in their everyday lives. Students will learn to compare ratios, find equivalent ratios, do scale drawings, convert between percents, fractions, and decimals, etc. Such mathematical skills will be strongly needed in students’ future lives and will enable students to evaluate important factors more precisely and make more reasoned decisions. Students will find such mathematical skills interesting and useful as they explore more and more real-world applications where they could connect the mathematical concepts and demonstrate their knowledge through problem solving. (2) A mathematics project conne...

Teaching Perspectives Inventory

I was surprised to see how accurate the results are. Except the fact that the scores are generally higher than I expected them to be, I think the results represent my perspectives pretty well. The test allows me to review my philosophical viewpoint. According to the results, nurturing is my dominant perspective whereas social reform is my recessive perspective. I was surprised by this because that is exactly what my perspectives are on roles as an educator (or a math teacher). The intention bar of the nurturing perspective is the highest and its action bar is the lowest. This result raises a question: Will the result change after my practicum? Will it change again when I really become a teacher? Since the test was taken assuming I have an experience teaching a classroom or currently work as a teacher, taking the test again when I actually have an experience might change the result. I might realize that another perspective other than the nurturing perspective is a lot more important. ...