Skip to main content

Course Reflection


Reading thorough my old posts I have written during this term, I realized something interesting. When I read articles and had to write reflections on them, I found them quite interesting but did not really reinforce those thoughts in myself. I thought they all had great ideas, but I did not pay attention afterwards. As I worked on various assignments for the course, including the math art project, two micro teaching lessons, and the final unit plan, and as I experienced many different teaching philosophies and styles of other peer TC's, I gradually became more adaptable to accept and change. Like other courses that have emphasized diversity in the classroom, the EDCP 342 course has helped me to accept others' opinions and behaviours.
I liked how we had chances to experience different aspects of teaching almost every class. The class activity where we discussed how formation of desks affects students' learning was very inspiring. It allowed me to think about other possible formations that could maximize students' learning depending on which activities they are doing. Micro teaching assignments were a great opportunity to look at how others teach and realize how comfortable I can be in front of people. Number of presentations that we had throughout the course allowed me to become more comfortable and confident in front of people.
Overall, the EDCP 342 course has been a great experience for me that let me explore about myself. Thank you for such experience, Susan!

Comments

  1. Thanks for this thoughtful response, Yeni! It is interesting to hear the contrast between learning from readings and learning from interactive experiences. The differences you experienced might also apply to your students' learning in math class: learning by being told or by reading something can be interesting, but less deeply meaningful than learning from active exploration, interactive experience and fuller engagement.

    It sounds like you have learned a lot this first term from all your classes. Hope you have an excellent second term and long practicum!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Skemp: Relational Understanding and Instrumental Understanding

The advantages of instrumental understanding Skemp lists in this article can be viewed as study strategies for students who want to have easier grades and see apparent progress. This type of learning could help students who have had serious problems with mathematics and just need the grades to pass a course. Although my teaching experience is very limited, I have witnessed quite a few students who say they hate mathematics, and some of those students even think that they would not need mathematics in the real world. They might be right in some way, but if they were taught to learn relationally rather than instrumentally, their mathematical approaches towards the world might have been very different. With instrumental mathematics taught, students might think they understand, but they are not able to apply those concepts they learned to different situations. Lack of this skill leads to memory work and eventually boring classes. In boring classes students tend to strive for ...

Unit Plan

EDCP 342A Unit planning Yeni Yoo St. John’s School, Math 8 Ratios, Rates, and Percentages Preplanning questions: (1) Why do we teach this unit to secondary school students? This unit explores the concepts of ratios, rates, and percentages. The unit focuses on some of the most essential mathematical skills that students could apply in their everyday lives. Students will learn to compare ratios, find equivalent ratios, do scale drawings, convert between percents, fractions, and decimals, etc. Such mathematical skills will be strongly needed in students’ future lives and will enable students to evaluate important factors more precisely and make more reasoned decisions. Students will find such mathematical skills interesting and useful as they explore more and more real-world applications where they could connect the mathematical concepts and demonstrate their knowledge through problem solving. (2) A mathematics project conne...

Teaching Perspectives Inventory

I was surprised to see how accurate the results are. Except the fact that the scores are generally higher than I expected them to be, I think the results represent my perspectives pretty well. The test allows me to review my philosophical viewpoint. According to the results, nurturing is my dominant perspective whereas social reform is my recessive perspective. I was surprised by this because that is exactly what my perspectives are on roles as an educator (or a math teacher). The intention bar of the nurturing perspective is the highest and its action bar is the lowest. This result raises a question: Will the result change after my practicum? Will it change again when I really become a teacher? Since the test was taken assuming I have an experience teaching a classroom or currently work as a teacher, taking the test again when I actually have an experience might change the result. I might realize that another perspective other than the nurturing perspective is a lot more important. ...